On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 04:41:20AM -0700, Nick Jacobs wrote: > The main result was that a small number of > Debian insiders posted abusive comments > in response to David's perfectly reasonable > message.
Maybe I've just been around the 'net too long and been too hardened by it, but I haven't seen anything (from either side) that I would call "abusive". > But what separates the doers from the wannabes > is the ability to admit a mistake, change > direction, and move on. As was mentioned here yesterday, dropping all the new architectures would not significantly affect the release timing, as the security team would still be unable to support both potato and a 6-arch woody without the infrastucture improvements which are underway and, when complete, will allow them to support an 11-arch woody. If the real problem is simply one of having too many archs, then it is that potato has too many, not that woody does. -- When we reduce our own liberties to stop terrorism, the terrorists have already won. - reverius Innocence is no protection when governments go bad. - Tom Swiss -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
