On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:10:52AM +1030, David Purton wrote: > Hi, > > I'm subscribed to a mailing list that seems to break just about every > rule of heard people fight bitterly over on this list :) > > The main thing I would like it to do is to thread properly, but > > The in-reply the headers are stuffed: > > ie: original message: > > Message-Id: <date [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The reply message then has a header like this: > > In-Reply-To: <date [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This obviously confuses mutt, and it wont thread by headers > > > Niether will it work using subject lines: > > original subject: > > [list-name] Subject > > reply subject > > [list-name] Re: Subject > > > So mutt doesn't thread on that either. > > Is there a way I can get around this? perhaps using a procmail rule? > or something else?
You could always just use procmail + sed to filter out '[list-name]' from the subject, then thread on that, I guess. It's still icky, though, is there any chance of convincing the other posters to use reasonable MUA's? -- Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://ertius.org/ If I want a CC, I'll ask for one! | Do I *look* like I want another damn war?
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
