On Tuesday 23 April 2002 16:17 pm, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 02:04:30PM -0500, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > > On Tuesday 23 April 2002 12:05 pm, Joey Hess wrote: > > > I strobgly sugest you file a bug; debian packages should not behave in > > > this fashion at all. > > > > I strongly suggest that software installation and software configuration > > are two distinctly separate tasks, and while the former should be handled > > by apt/dpkg, the latter should be left to the discretion of the sysadmin > > (pref. with an option to enable auto-configuration on a per-package > > basis). > > > > The bug is in apt/dpkg. > > Do you even know how those tools work?
According to dpkg(8) those tools consider "unpacked" (but not configured) and "half-configured" as "package states". That tells me that package configuration is, indeed, part of apt/dpkg's domain. Please tell me if this isn't so, and I'll file a bug against dpkg manpage. ...It's up to individual packages, > not the package management tools. I should have said it's a design bug in Debian as a whole, but OK then, have it your way: the bug is between some package maintainers' chairs and keyboards. Dima -- Politics and religion are just like software and hardware. They all suck, the documentation is provably incorrect, and all the vendors tell lies. -- Andrew Dalgleish -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]