on Mon, Apr 22, 2002, Shawn McMahon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > begin Karsten M. Self quotation: > > > > First, ricochet is pretty naive. It would be very helpful to specify > > _only_ non-spoofed headers be responded to. This is difficult to do, > > spamcop does a pretty good job of it. It's not perfect, but it's pretty > good.
My problem was automating it. With 50-100 messages daily, I am simply _not_ going to spend much time processing spam. SA does a good enough job on the initial cut that it meets my needs. Let's say that spamcop and I misfired a time or two too many. Peace. -- Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? A guide to GNU/Linux backups: http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Linux/FAQs/backups.html
pgplm1zOkCbWK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
