On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 09:19:47AM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote: | * Paul 'Baloo' Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020412 22:57]: | > > This is probably the biggest issue; I've gotten several conflicting | > > recommendations about devfs/devfsd. What are the advantages of going | > > to the new devfs/devfsd? | > | > You get to delete /dev/* and reclaim disk space and inodes, and the | > contents of /dev/ depend entirely on what your kernel supports and the | > hardware that actually exists. | | I know others have mentioned that devfs support is still experimental, | but there's been plenty of options in the kernel that were marked | "experimental" and were perfectly usable. Is devfs 50% stable, 80%, 99%, | what ??
I've been using it for several months now and really like it. I haven't had any stability problems. In fact, it helped me to trace down the problem with my cd drive. As I said earlier it is a module in the ready-made 2.4 kernels. I didn't know that, but the fact that I had no device file for it indicated that the kernel didn't know it existed, rather than some application having trouble. | I might be interested in trying it out. I just found this site, | http://www.atnf.csiro.au/people/rgooch/linux/docs/devfs.html. Is it the | official devfs "home" ?? It looks like it, and Richard Gooch is the primary developer of it from my understanding. To set it up is trivially easy! First apt-get install devfsd. Then add "devfs=mount" to your kernel command line when you reboot. If you don't want it, remove that argument. HTH, -D -- If any of you lacks wisdom, he should ask God, who gives generously to all without finding fault, and it will be given to him. But when he asks he must believe and not doubt, because he who doubts is like a wave of the sea, blown and tossed by the wind. James 1:5-6 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
