On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 01:33:23PM -0400, Craig Duncan wrote: > David Turetsky writes: > > > Mutt is great. Read enough of the handbook or info to get started, > > then add to your knowledge as situations require. I started using it > > a year or two ago and find it a real treat > > > > -- > > David > > I just recently dumped Netscape mail in favor of vm (in emacs). > > [snip] > > So, i'm wondering if anyone has any experience with mutt and vm on > which to base a comparison. My reticence in not trying mutt earlier > is the idea that i have to then go _into_ an editor to do stuff that i > frequently do (not only reply but also snip bits and pieces out for > saving). My editor is emacs. I don't want to use anything else and i > can't quite comprehend how mutt and emacs could integrate very well.
I don't see how that would be a problem. You can tell mutt which editor to use. Maybe I'm missing something emacs-specific here, as I don't use it myself. Oh, and you can edit the message itself as well, not just your replies. -- Note that I use Debian version 3.0 Linux mus 2.4.17mvz4 #1 Fri Mar 15 23:30:15 CET 2002 i686 unknown Matijs van Zuijlen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
