On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 07:54:52 +0100, Simon Hepburn wrote: >ben wrote: > >> thanks for the input. so, on attachments, none? some? > >If I'm helping people out with, say X problems for example, I'd far prefer to >see their config and log files as attachments rather than pasted, simply >beccause of the sheer length of them. Also a lot of files, for example fstab, >are just plain awkward to read when pasted and wrapped. And what about gpg ? >Attachments are pretty useful things on the whole, even if some of them might >contain things none of us are interested in .
Attachments are useful precisely because "some of them might contain things none of us are interested in." -- gt It is interesting to note that as one evil empire (generic) fell, another Evil Empire (tm) began its nefarious rise. -- me Coincidence? I think not. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
