On Tue, 9 Apr 2002 07:49:01 +0100 "Phillip Deackes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2002 14:22:25 +0200 > Luca Pasquali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Galeon is the only substitute that I've in mind by now, links rox > > :-) keta > > Depends whether you do 'real-world' bowsing or not. There is no > browser in Linux which can correctly display all web sites thrown at > it. AFAIK Konqueror, for example, can't display secure web pages, That's not true. I'm using it for all my https:// browsing, although it is a little strict on what it thinks is a valid certificate. > ruling it out for things like on-line banking etc.. I need to use > Opera, Galeon and Netscape 6 to cover most sites, and Netscape 4 is an Unfortunately this is true, you need multiple browsers if you want to see everything (konqueror helps to give you a bigger range), but then you've also got sites that refuse to work with anything other than ie. That's only because there are a lot of worthless/lazy web builders out there. If you try it isn't really that hard to let something comply with w3c standards and to write a script that works on both ie and mozilla (and the sort). But it's a fact that most web builders only think ie. The one thing you can do is try to make the people who paid for such a site understand that they paid for a broken product. > Galeon is probably the best at the moment - but it has a way to > go. I personally like konqueror, but it too isn't there yet... Grts, Tim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
