Actually my problem was with getting the virtualhost part to work right. If you wouldn't mind, I would greatly appreciate being able to see a working httpd.conf with mod-ssl and virtualhost setup.
Thanks! Sean On Sun, 2002-03-24 at 21:38, Jason Healy wrote: > At 1017022192s since epoch (03/24/02 21:09:52 -0500 UTC), Sean wrote: > > I wonder how many resources running two apaches sucks ... I tried to get > > the ssl mod working with the regular apache, but to no avail. I've been > > considering running the apache-ssl in parallel, just seems like an awful > > waste of reasources. > > > > Opinions? > > I had a webmail setup running, and I too ran apache-ssl in parallel, > which did suck a lot of resources. However, the server wasn't busy, > so I didn't care. > > This week I had time to catch up on some stuff, so I got mod_ssl > working under apache and was able to drop apache-ssl altogether. I'm > no apache expert, but it would seem to me that if you can get all that > you need with one binary instead of two, you should go for that instead. > > What problems were people having getting mod_ssl folded in? My only > trouble was with virtual hosts (as ssl doesn't support name-based > virtual hosts), but after that, all was well. > > I'm happy to share my httpd.conf if anyone is curious. > > Jason > > -- > Jason Healy | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.logn.net/ > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- GPG Public Key available: http://sean.gutenpress.org/sean.asc
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
