On 0, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Most (all?) packages providing a daemon or other service will start > it when installed, without asking the user first. Is there a reason? > I often want to have such services ready for use (with documentation > and configuration files), but not started immediately, i.e. not > running by default. [snip]
<opinion> The current behaviour is far more sensible to a non-expert user than the opposite behaviour, where he installs (say) apache, then bombards the list with messages with the subject 'broken apache - doesn't start' so that he can be told he needs to 'update-rc.d apache start 90 2 3 4 5 . stop 20 0 1 6 .'. A user who wants a web-server shouldn't then have to figure that out to start the web-server. In fact, I've probably got it wrong anyway since I don't use update-rc.d but just mangle the symlinks manually. If you don't want something to start on bootup, then to solution is: for i in `find . -type f -name S90telnetd` ; do mv $i `echo $i | sed s/S90telnetd/K90telnetd` ; done There is probably a much easier way of doing it than that, but it works, and this is my opinion, after all. </opinion> Tom -- Tom Cook Information Technology Services, The University of Adelaide "That you're not paranoid does not mean they're not out to get you." - Robert Waldner
pgp4eoqDhHc0Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature