On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi, > > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 18968 Mar 10 16:28 /sbin/fsck > -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 100120 Mar 10 16:28 /sbin/fsck.ext2 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 100120 Mar 10 16:28 /sbin/fsck.ext3 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 97532 Sep 22 08:15 /sbin/fsck.ext3,ext2 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 21144 Jan 26 23:05 /sbin/fsck.minix > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Jan 4 21:19 /sbin/fsck.msdos -> > dosfsck > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 413 Jan 25 05:05 /sbin/fsck.nfs > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Jan 4 21:19 /sbin/fsck.vfat -> > dosfsck > > > I looked at my directory and found strange thing. I think I did > hardlink and upgraded fsck. > > Should I have done symlink??? Any comment? I thought I made > /sbin/fsck.ext3,ext2 as the same size as /sbin/fsck.ext3 ??? why??? I have the same hardlinks and I never did this myself. Conclusion must be that the system does it for you. My problem is my root partition still mounts as ext2 even though fstab says ext3. I converted it from ext2. My guess is that /etc/fstab was incorrectly set when I compiled my kernel and mkinitrd ran? -walter
