On 10-Mar-2002 Randolph S. Kahle wrote: > I have started reading details about Woody. (I am running Potato on all > of my machines with the 2.4 kernel). > > I was surprise to see that the 2.4 kernel is "optional". This leads me > to a fundamental question... What makes Woody different? > > Are there structure changes (layout, etc.) that are incompatible with > Potato? If not, why not just keep upgrading the packages. >
2.4 is the default though, you still have the choice of using 2.2. Woody is roughly 2 years worth of new code. That is the big difference. XFr ee 4.x not 3.3.x, etc.
