Gary Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Harry, try here [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've seen all > kinds of discussions on just this type of question. Some serious emacs > dev types hang out there. If you can't get an answer there, then the > only answer is "42" Oh, thanks, I didn't know about that list. But your reference to "42" sailed right over my head...
- emacs21 Harry Putnam
- Re: emacs21 Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
- Re: emacs21 Gary Turner
- Re: emacs21 Harry Putnam
- Re: emacs21 Eric G. Miller
- Re: emacs21 Gary Turner
- Re: 42 (was emacs21) Randy Orrison
- Re: 42 (was emacs21) Gary Turner
- OT Re: 42 (was emacs21) Chris Jenks
- Re: OT Re: 42 (was emacs... Richard Hector
- Re: OT Re: 42 (was emacs... Richard Hector
- Re: OT Re: 42 (was emacs... Matijs van Zuijlen
- Re: OT Re: 42 (was emacs... Isabelle HURBAIN
- Re: OT Re: 42 (was emacs... Richard Hector