* Craig Dickson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly: > begin Patrick Kirk quotation: > > > The question is why do so many otherwise sensible people feel the need > > for digital signatures on this list? After all, most of the messages > > are not the type of thing that justify it. > > Depends. Once you have the capability to sign your messages, why not use > it all the time?
Hmm. Everything I post here is archived in at least two places: dejagoogle and ML archive, and I don't think either is going to go away anytime soon. Some of my archived posts... well, ten years down the track I might want to deny under oath I wrote them. ...The only point to intentionally _not_ signing a message > would seem to be if you wanted to be able to claim later that it was a > forgery. Yes, that's the idea. Dima -- Well, lusers are technically human. -- Red Drag Diva
