I have used 2.4.17 without problems. If 2.2.18 is what comes with woody now, then I guess it looks like favourite for the woody release.
Tom Geoff Ludwiczak wrote: > > I have been using kernel 2.4.18-pre9 for the past couple days and see no > problems with it so far. I was using 2.4.17 before, and had no troubles with > it either. Try 2.4.17, but if you're going to use 2.2, then just use 2.2.20. > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 08:34:00PM -0800, Paul E Condon wrote: > > I have just done dist-upgrade from Potato to Woody. I have been > > using/learning > > Debian for a few months. This was the first serious change from my initial > > installation. The upgrade went smoothly, but took a while at 56k. I found > > many > > nice improvements, but saw that the kernel had not been upgraded. I suppose > > I > > could have known this before hand if I had read the right documents more > > carefully, but I didn't. > > > > Now I look at the offerings of kernels in dselect. Which is recommended? > > Of course I have to choose one that corresponds to my CPU, but what of > > versioning? I see 2.2.20, 2.4.13, 2.4.14, 2.4.16, and 2.4.17. There are > > limits to my adventurousness. Which is the likely choise for the default > > Woody kernel when it becomes "stable"? I think I would like to use that one > > if there are not good reasons to avoid it now. > > > > Thanks. > > -- > > Paul E Condon > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
