Is there a good reason you need 1.1.4? Why not just use 1.3.1_02 or whatever
the latest is? It's back in the dark ages, but I seem to remember installing
1.1.x as a plugin being horribly painful...
Tom
johan boeckx wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> For my banking program in belgium, i need a browser who has jdk 1.1.4
> plugged in. So I try with netscape (because quite standard) and
> installed jdk1.1-dev jdk1.1-native jdk1.1-native-dev
> and also ibm-jdk1.1-installer in combination with
> ibm-jdk-l118-linux-x86. Now I want to know who to get it plugged in in
> netscape ?
>
> Any suggestions ?
> greetz,
> Johan
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Tom Cook
"I do not believe, you know, that the art and practice of
sitting on the fence is sufficiently appreciated in our
society. To me, it is an occupational necessity."
- Prince Phillip
Level 6
10 Pultney St.
Adelaide University, AUSTRALIA 5005
Ph : +61 8 8303 6110
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------
This email message is intended only for the addressee(s)
and contains information which may be confidential and/or
copyright. If you are not the intended recipient please
do not read, save, forward, disclose, or copy the contents
of this email. If this email has been sent to you in error,
please notify the sender by reply email and delete this
email and any copies or links to this email completely and
immediately from your system. No representation is made
that this email is free of viruses. Virus scanning is
recommended and is the responsibility of the recipient.
