On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 05:57:02PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: | In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | >On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:52:03AM -0500, stan wrote: | >| Anyone know if SpamBouncer www.spambouncer.org is being mainatined? | >dunno | | Me neither. Since what it does is bombard the victim the spammer forged | in the headers, hopfully it's dead and won't be revived. If you want to | bounce spam, do it in the SMTP session you're receiving the message in.
Oh, I didn't even know what it was. This is a _really_ bad idea since the From: address can very easily be forged. | >| If not, any sugestions as to an alternate? | >http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/config_docs/exim_spamassassin.html | | Does something totally different, Apparently. It is still related to spam though ;-). | and could be useful. | The default rule scoring seems pretty far off to me though. Can you expand on this? -D -- It took the computational power of three Commodore 64s to fly to the moon. It takes at least a 486 to run Windows 95. Something is wrong here.
