Pann McCuaig wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 14:24, Xeno Campanoli wrote: > > > I do this: > > > > inneal:~# cat /usr/include/linux/version.h | grep 2.2.20 > > #define UTS_RELEASE "2.2.20" > > > > and doing it with 2.2.19 finds nothing. This got updated from one > > greater than the last kernel number before, so it's been that way for > > two episodes. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -S /usr/include/linux/version.h > libc6-dev: /usr/include/linux/version.h > > Best guess is that the current libc6 in potato was built on a machine > running kernel-2.2.20. Sorta tacky considering kernel-source-2.2.20 > isn't even available via apt for potato. > > But I think that's the answer to your question.
That sounds like a pretty good answer. It seems way to silly to be a security hack, but I still wanted to ask that, being the way I am. I'll CC the debian group. Perhaps they'll take a look. > > Luck, > Pann > -- > geek by nature, Linux by choice L I N U X .~. > The Choice /V\ > http://www.ourmanpann.com/linux/ of a GNU /( )\ > Generation ^^-^^ > > _______________________________________________ > linux-list mailing list --> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.ssc.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-list -- http://www.eskimo.com/~xeno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Physically I'm at: 5101 N. 45th St., Tacoma, WA, 98407-3717, U.S.A.
