On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 23:14:29 -0500, Alec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 01 February 2002 02:20 pm, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > > > > > > Just goes to show that "worse is better". > > > > In some ways, maybe, but Tanenbaum's points were perfectly valid. > > What do you mean "but"? That's the point of "worse is better" (I think Dr. > Dobbs Journal had a piece on this): Timely initial delivery is more important > to the success of software than its quality.
See: http://www.ai.mit.edu/docs/articles/good-news/section3.2.html -- Eric G. Miller <egm2@jps.net>
