On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 11:36:44PM -0500, Brenda J. Butler wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:49:32PM +0200, Ian Balchin wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 07:06:13PM -0500, Brenda J. Butler wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 12:08:22AM +0200, Ian Balchin wrote: > > > > While using fetchmail all goes OK until reaching message 91 and then > > > > > > > > 'reading message No 91' > > > > SIGPIPE thrown from an MDA or a stream socket error > > So, maybe there is a way to get fetchmail to download all the > emails and just put them in a file (instead of handing them > off to exim), on which you could run formail... well you've > solved the problem another way, but this could have been another > solution.
Well..... I dialed in again and got thrown off the same message, the ISP had not nuked it. I then ran $ fetchmail -e 50 -v -v > message.ngo wow! ##### across the screen and a quick spy from mc showed the file in creation. Here is what i find. fetchmail: POP3< 1 6806 # that was the expected length :) etc reading message 1 of 322 lots of About to rewrite ........ Rewritten version ....... etc (can i chop this as I will have no local messages being single dialup user??) THEN ..... (i wish that [EMAIL PROTECTED] mouse would cut and paste, come back Bill, all is forgiven ;) ) fetchmail: about to deliver with: /usr/bin/exim inksi fetchmail: message 1 was not the expected length (6802 actual != 6806 expected) flushed fetchmail: POP3> DELE 1 fetchmail: POP3< +OK message 1 deleted and then on to succesfully load the next message but worse..... ! there are lots of messages that are not the expected length which were DELE'd. (No. 50 being one and which I spotted when looking to see what it did at '-e 50'. (I can send you the file if you want ;) ) Did I get the 332 after all? I don't know. I will have check future downloads. (I had deleted a few and _procmail_ had moved a few too.) [ Brenda & Dman.. I get lots of duplicates from you. howcome? I have set subscribe for the list, and this is supposed to set a mail-followup-to header that prevents your MUA from sending copies to the personal address of the list post concerned. Closer inspection of some of dmans dupes makes me think they come via the list, but then I am not skilled enough to decipher the headers] At least we stayed connected. I _think_ there is another thread running where it was suggested that limiting the number of fetchmail messages by -e would solve a similar (not the same necessarily) (but cannot find it right now). I have also set in .muttrc the index header to show me who is sending the email (and not all from debian-list). Neat. > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Welcome to the GNU age! http://www.gnu.org -- Ian Balchin http://www.imaginet.co.za/fables This machine is running Debian GNU/Linux ... http://www.debian.org
