ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 13 January 2002 02:11 pm, Seneca Cunningham wrote: > [snip] > > > > > "X -configure" is... > > > > > > (==) CHIPS(0): Min pixel clock is 11.000MHz > > > (--) CHIPS(0): Max pixel clock is 56.000MHz > > > > > > ... and from the "xf86cfg -textmode" method... > > > > > > (==) CHIPS(0): Min pixel clock is 5.500MHz > > > (--) CHIPS(0): Max pixel clock is 28.000MHz > > > > i don't have a solution but have you noticed that the x-configure values are > exactly double the textmode values. i have no idea why this is but i thought > it might be useful to point that out.
And each of range includes, or almost includes, the working clocks value from my old X3 config of 28.32. And both config files had to have a modeline manually entered before I could get anything to appear, other than an error message. The X3 xf86config program says _not_ to probe clocks, but X4 looks like it is probing clocks. > btw, are you running a 2.2 kernel? i couldn't get x4 to run on 2.2, and went I am running a 2.4 kernel. > with the 2.4 kernels for that reason. don't know exactly why--i was more > interested in the functionality than the detective work. Detective work is how I survive computer science while forgetting to hand anything in... I get some credit for testfiles that crash the same number of (or sometimes more) programs than the teacher's (most of the caught problems are null pointers), while my programs run unscathed. Thanks for any help, Seneca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
