on Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 01:19:27PM +0100, martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> also sprach Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> [2002.01.12.0835 +0100]:
> > Wrong. Cf: Nemeth, et al, or Frisch. Both cite /etc/{init,rc?}.d.
> >
> > RH invented the rc.d/ directory variant.
>
> they sure did. but in 7.0, redhat provided the /etc/init.d symlink, and
> i believe that 7.2 had it completely switched. im not sure actually.
> redhat *is* aware that they are the onlu ones, and that /etc/rc.d/init.d
> is uncool.
LDS indicates /etc/{init,rc}.d, so RH is coming around to the standard.
Mind you, when I try explaining this to my RH friends, there's generally
strong resistence to the concept that Dweebian might have got this one
right....
Peace.
--
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Home of the brave
http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ Land of the free
We freed Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
pgpzpwbd4jpDq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
