On Wednesday 09 January 2002 12:46 pm, Robert L. Harris wrote: > I'm starting a "Debian Vs Redhat" comparision. At this point I just have > the ball rolling. Many other people showed interest so I'm throwing this > out for public addition/correction. (We use Solaris systems so the > SYSV/BSD is a valid point) > > Please feel free to add on, but lets keep the jokes to a minumum for now... > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >----- > > > Common to both: > Integrated Package Management (rpm/deb) > Alien can be used to convert RPM's to DEB and vice versa. > Commercial Support from outside paid vendors > > > Debian: > Server Oriented > Integraged software install/update tool (apt) [a version is available > for redhat but requires considerable time/effort to install] > Publicly available 3 tier development cycle (dev, test, production) > Publicly available bug archive for testing and searching > System layout is SYSV like Solaris > > > > RedHat: > Well Known > Desktop Oriented > No pre-installed install/update tool (apt) > Dev and Test cycles are internal only or non-existant > Bug tracking system is not available for searching > System layout is BSD > > :wq! >
get back to work!
