csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:59:20 +0100 > martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > also sprach Christoph Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.07.1547 +0100]: > > > > is this good or bad? hda2 is my swap partition: > > > > > > This is bad (<1/6). > > > > what do you mean? > > > > > > /dev/hda2: > > > > Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.99 seconds = 129.29 MB/sec > > > > Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 21.93 seconds = 2.92 MB/sec > > > > > > /dev/hda1: > > > Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.77 seconds =166.23 MB/sec > > > Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 3.33 seconds = 19.22 MB/sec > > > > jealous! what's the RPM on your drive? > > Are you sure it's something to get jealous over? I'm pretty sure I have > a 5400rpm 20GB drive (by Fujitsu). Look at my stats after I enabled DMA and > (some other kernel options I don't have at the tip of my finger right > now): > > # hdparm -Tt /dev/hda > > /dev/hda: > Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.82 seconds =156.10 MB/sec > Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 2.99 seconds = 21.40 MB/sec > > I've seen a discussion here some whiles back about a guy who got > 33MB+/sec.
It's all about scsi baby... /dev/sdb: Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.78 seconds =164.10 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.62 seconds = 39.51 MB/sec -- Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
