Alan Chandler wrote: > Since 2.4.17 is out now I would use that - IMHO its the most stable
Of course, it just came out yesterday, so any judgment on its stability is premature. That said, I'm running 2.4.17 now and I haven't observed any problems yet. Btw, Debian Woody/Sid users who want to compile recent 2.4 kernels will probably find that they have to downgrade binutils to 2.11.92.0.10-4 to avoid weird build failures. I couldn't build 2.4.17 with the newest binutils. There are some existing bugs on these problems which appear to have been assigned to the kernel-source maintainer (not, as one might expect, the binutils maintainer, though the bugs were originally filed against binutils). This old version of binutils may be obtained from my archive site at http://crdic.ath.cx/debian (use a web browser, not dpkg -- it's not a proper package repository, just a directory with a bunch of packages in it). You can also use TuxFinder at http://www.tuxfinder.org, which has options to search for .deb files. Craig