hi, *PLEASE DON'T MAKE THIS INTO A FLAME WAR* if you are taking anything personal, please don't reply...
i have always used postgresql for everything. i don't really know why, but i know that it's a pretty scalable, high-performance database server that is secure and powerful. a client of one of my servers has recently requested mysql. i need postgres, so i'd install mysql in parallel, but i first would like to know about the negative aspects. from what i remember, mysql isn't a true database, and security isn't one of it's virtues. could you shine some light on these and other aspects, please? -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED] prepBut nI vrbLike adjHungarian! qWhat's artThe adjBig nProblem? -- alec flett @netscape
pgp2ZhQC1B2ub.pgp
Description: PGP signature
