Hi, As previous poster said "what is your Debian box's config"
Please post output of "ifconfig" command together with "/etc/network/interfaces". Also state "potato" or "woody". Cheers :-) On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 07:25:52PM -0700, Jeff Vincent wrote: > There are no other routers between the subnets that I know of. > > When we configure our machines statically, all use the same static > route at address X.Y.D.254 (same as static route?) and all use the same > subnet mask of 255.255.252.0 regardless of subnet and has been that way > for nearly 2 years. (netmasks have always been a bit of voodoo magic > for me anyway (see question below)? ack!) However, our IS dept. told > us to use that subnet mask and additionally delegated us a domain and > the 4 class C subnets for our testing use. At least I thought they were > class C address blocks: > > X.Y.A.[0-255] > X.Y.B.[0-255] > X.Y.C.[0-255] > X.Y.D.[0-255] > > where the '0' is the network and '255' is the broadcast address. > > Also, the dhcp server is also our dns server ( address: X.Y.D.252 ) > with a single NIC (eth0) and I can browse the web and ping anything in > or out of our lab by name or address from this machine, so the interface > seems to be working. > > Regardless, I added the 'option routers' and 'option broadcast-address' > to each subnet declaration as you suggested and still the same message: > .... -- ~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ + Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuPG-key: 1024D/D5DE453D + + My debian quick-reference, http://qref.sourceforge.net/quick/ +
