* Cam Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake thus: > * DvB ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> On a side note, when asking a new question, please refrain from >> replying to an already posted message since this screws up threaded >> views in mail clients that support them. It also screws up web >> archives that attempt to keep up with threads and makes finding help >> in the archives even harder than it already is since threads will >> often be broken or lost in the middle by unrelated replies. >> > On this topic, has anyone else noticed that the thread-breaking > command in the latest version of mutt (woody) is missing?
Yep, it's not even in the listing of unbound commands. Wonder what happened to it? I only found out about it 3 days ago, and have been really addicted to it since (I have used it *a lot*). It would be superflous if people didn't start a new thread by just replying a message in the mailbox because they can't be arsed to type in the name of the list though[1]. File a bug-report :-) I am reverting to the "old" mutt for the time being I think, unless it breaks lots of dependencies. Stig [1] I have "du" and "dl" as aliases for debian-user and debian-laptop respectively... -- brautaset.org Registered Linux User 107343
