> I'd suggest a massive response (that is, many people, not one person > replying many times) to the postmaster address, or other WHOIS contacts > listed if postmaster is invalid (an RFC 822 violation, FWIW).
FYI, - RFC-822 has been replaced with RFC-2822 (Internet Message Format) http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2822.txt - See also RFC-2142 (MAILBOX NAMES FOR COMMON SERVICES, ROLES AND FUNCTIONS), for suggested names like "info", "marketing", "sales", "support", "abuse", "noc", "security", "postmaster", "hostmaster", et. al. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2142.txt - See also RFC-3013 (Recommended Internet Service Provider Security Services and Procedures) http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3013.txt regards, -- Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim - VLSM-TJT - http://rms46.vlsm.org PMPO net user count: Pathetic Meaningless Pillory Outcome
