On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:41:08PM +0100, Emil Pedersen wrote: > Running "apt-get dist-upgrade"? Would that realy change/benefit much if > there's only one application (the database engine) that needs lsf > support? Since it's a server that preferably should be up 24/7 I want > to stick to the most stable solution possible.
You've already changed the C library...woody is much better tested than some random combination of woody+potato. Beyond that, are you sure you won't need *any* other userspace utilities that recognize large files? Perhaps ls? Once you start doing this it's often better to stick with an integrated whole than going the piecemeal approach. -- Mike Stone
