On Sunday 28 October 2001 13:32, csj wrote: > On Monday 29 October 2001 01:38, Bud Rogers wrote: > > On Friday 26 October 2001 19:41 pm, Antonio Rodriguez wrote: > > > Thought may be interesting for the debian community: > > > NEW YORK (October 26, 2001 4:29 p.m. EDT) - Microsoft's premiere > > > Web portal, MSN.com, denied access to millions of people who use > > > alternative browser software such as Opera and told them to get > > > Microsoft's products instead. > > > http://www.nandotimes.com/technology/story/158273p-1497208c.html > > > > First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you, > > and then you win. > > What's wrong with Microsoft banning certain users from their OWN site? > It's like complaining to a fancy restaurant that your shorts are okay > despite the dress code. Maybe you could just run IE under wine.
That depends on your definition of "wrong." Certainly, I'd say that MS has the legal right to set up their site anyway they like. But the question of what's right, in the sense of what's allowable, is different from the question of what's right, in the sense of either what's proper or what's wise. Just because someone CAN do something does not mean that they SHOULD.
