on Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 12:30:03PM +0200, "Jürgen A. Erhard" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >>>>> "Karsten" == Karsten M Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> writes: > > Karsten> I agree that it's a useful "quick-shot" browser, and it > Karsten> definitely fills a niche. With c'n'p, frames, SSL, and > Karsten> cookies, it's ready for a full-featured replacement on > Karsten> small/old boxen. > > I'm not sure I want all that fancy stuff... not if it makes it too > bulky. Okay, c'n'p is a must. Frames would be nice. SSL and > cookies? Not really that important. I mean, there *are* already > browsers that do all that. > > Make it lightweight, and if necessary to achieve that, less > featureful. But small footprint is important. (At least until I get > myself a bigger notebook ;-)
The advantage of adding c'n'p, frames, and ssl support would be that the browser (205 KB) is tiny, has a small footprint, and would be an excellent choice for small, underpowered, systems. This doesn't just include 6 year old 486 systems, but a new class of portable, embedded, handheld, and "wearable" systems. Having a full-featured browser would be a tremendous plus. This is a design intent of dillo as I understand. Peace. -- Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Home of the brave http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ Land of the free Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
pgpKSf2Eqzg70.pgp
Description: PGP signature
