I'm no expert comparing to the other people here who've experimented the
whole thing out, but I'd think that you might want to get at least 3 IDE
drives and set up RAID 5 instead.
Say you got 3 20GB HDs, RAID 1 (mirroring) would only give you 20GB of
space, while RAID 5 would provide more, yet still be able to make sure
that if one of the drive fails, you can still run with the data on the
other two drives and not be missing anything. I'm fairly sure that most
high end server at least uses some form of RAID 5 because of its advantages.
Others already raised a good point. Does data integrity means no
downtime or no data loss. If they meant no downtime, then your task is
much, much harder.
Good luck! =)
Calyth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Software RAID and drive failures Juhan Kundla
- Re: Software RAID and drive failures Ron Johnson
- Re: Software RAID and drive failures nate
- SmartUPS (Re: Software RAID and drive failur... Joao Pedro Clemente
- Re: Software RAID and drive failures Massimiliano Ferrero
- Re: Software RAID and drive failures Calyth
- Re: Software RAID and drive failures nate
- Re: Software RAID and drive fai... Alvin Oga
- [OT] High-availability comp... Ron Johnson
- Re: Software RAID and drive... Calyth
- Re: Software RAID and drive failures Massimiliano Ferrero
- Re: Software RAID and drive fai... Ron Johnson
- Re: Software RAID and drive... Massimiliano Ferrero
- Re: Software RAID and d... Ron Johnson
- Re: Software RAID and drive... Mike Dresser
- Re: Software RAID and drive... Kirk Strauser