Karsten M. Self wrote: > > I've found unstable to be of better use than testing. The reason is > > that even bugfixes need at least 10 days to go into testing, whereas in > > unstable they could be included the next day. > > ...but not security updates, IIRC. These should be available > immediately.
So you're saying that things that go into the security updates site don't also appear in unstable? And this isn't just because the security fixes are against stable packages that are already superseded in unstable? Craig
