on Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 12:51:50PM -0500, Richard Cobbe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Greetings, all. > > I'm running a stock Potato r3, and I'm having some difficulty getting X to > cooperate. My computer uses the Intel i810 chipset on its video hardware, > and I've downloaded the necessary modules and X server from Intel, and in > general, things are working fine. > > Intel's X server for this chipset does not currently support 32bpp, so I'm > running at 24. This makes a number of applications slightly cranky: some > of Netscape's icons don't display correctly, and acroread either crashes or > displays the document incorrectly.
Solve these two problems by ditching the proprietary crap. On a 300MHz+
CPU, Galeon kicks Netscape's ass off the planet. On older hardware,
life's a bit more difficult, but Dillo's good enough for basic browsing,
w3m has ssl support, and there's BrowseX (not packaged for Debian) which
is full-featured from what I understand.
GV will read many PDFs, xdpf should read the rest. Boycott Adobe!
> I don't want to run 16bpp on a regular basis, because my monitor doesn't
> handle that particular video mode as well---it displays, but it's not as
> crisp as 24/32 bpp modes.
You've got a compromise situation here. You makes your choice, you
takes your licks.
> I'd like to run two X servers on this machine: one in 24bpp on vt7,
> for my normal stuff, and one in 16bpp mode on vt8 for those apps which
> can't handle 24bpp mode. (I'm not running [xgk]dm or any of the other
> display managers.) I've done this previously under RH6.2, so I know
> this is possible in theory.
Possible alternative: Xnest. You should be able to run 24 + 16 bpp in
Xnest for broken apps if you insist on running them.
> So. As a normal user, I tried `startx -- -bpp 24 :0', and this worked
> fine. After this, I switched back to a text console and did
> `startx -- -bpp 16 :1'. This brought up an X server on vt8, but all of the
> clients started in my .xsession appeared on display :0, not display :1.
> Since FVWM refuses to run on display twice, this second server terminates
> as soon as it gets through the interactive bits of my .xsession.
I think display may need to be the first server argument:
$ startx -- :<display> -<arguments>
You can also set up lines in the Xservers file of your X display
manager -- [xwgk]dm.
Hmm...I'm finding that startx doesn't respect my server specification.
but xinit does. Odd. Investigate this (I'm using testing here), may be
a bug.
E.g.:
$ startx -- :1
$ startx -- :2
$ startx
...all fail.
$ xinit -- :1
...works as expected.
...this is with an existing X session on :0.
--
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal
http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org
Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
pgpffUttTJyDl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
