hzi wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mensagem anterior <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> No dia 26/07/01, 06:00:10, Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu o
> seguinte sobre o tema balsa: orphaned?:
>
> > what's up with balsa? there's a huge number of old bugs (year or two
> > old) including the ne that makes it uninstallable (+2 month days):
>
> > Grave functionality bugs - outstanding
>
> > (A list of all such bugs used to be available).
>
> > #98110: balsa: depends on libltdl0, which has been removed
> > Package: balsa; Severity: grave; Reported by: Colin Watson
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 66 days old.
>
> > anybody knows what's going on?
>
> >
> Hey, Balsa is great, in that it uses Unix mbox, and you can use procmail
> with it.
> It shouldn't be orphaned, if it's tue, what a shame!
I mean the debian package seems to be not taken care of, not balsa
itself. there are quite a few bug (lot of them 1+ year old), it's not
even installable (in unstable) - that's an 2+ months old bug (depends on
non-existing library):
balsa: Depends: libltdl0 but it is not installable
erik
