Charles Sebold wrote: > On 21 Tammuz 5761, Kurt Lieber wrote: > > > So, here's a list of my requirements and I'm hoping you guys can point > > me to an MUA that meets them. If so, I'll gladly switch over to Linux > > full-time and forswear Microsoft forever. :)
> But you seem very wedded to the _way_ Outlook does things; I can almost > guarantee that the fact that Gnus can do all this, doesn't mean that > you'll like it. That's exactly what I thought when I read the list, so declined to answer it. I _hate_ it when someone asks me if the so-called great Linux they heard about can fill their needs and then that someone proceeds to spell out their needs as exactly what Microsoft provides them with. I just reply that they appear to be married to MS software, and no, it doesn't run on Linux. What's the point? There will always be a pull-down menu that's different, and we all know that the MS way will be better. I continue to do stuff _differently_ on Linux. Peter
