> > I'm told that this is a bug in the 2.4 series- does anyone know if upgrading
> > to 2.4.6 will help this problem at all? If not, are there any other
> > workarounds?
> >
> >
> One work around is to make sure that you have a swap partition at least
> twice as big as physical memory. This has been just a rule of thumb prior
> to 2.4, but seems to be pretty important now.
No- the other way around, in fact. I have 256 meg RAM and 127 meg swap. Is
there still a rule that swap partitions can be no larger than 127 meg? If
not, I shall have to look into repartitioning...
--
Geoffrey M. Romer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
"Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right"
-Salvor Hardin
"I can't leave you alone with this man! He might be a tenor!"
-Fred Astaire
