Woops... I was just planning on installing KDE on my old computer
(486, 40kHz CPU). I guess I'll try something else if there are already
problems running it on a 166...
>
> uwm ('ultimate window manager') is very interesting. not much to
look at,
> but really really neat and different.
>
> did i just type 'neat'?
>
> glenn becker
>
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Daniel Hoffman
> wrote:
>
> > The list so far:
> > BlackBox
> > IceWM
> > fvwm2
> > fvwm95
> > sawfish
> > XFce
> > PWM
> >
> > Thanks for the great (and very quick) response so far--any others
i should
> > add to my "shopping" list?
> > __
> > Daniel Hoffman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > "Voice come from cow on wall."
> > "If you find a solution and become attached to it, the solution
may become
> > your next problem."
> > ©2001
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "ktb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 8:10 PM
> > Subject: Re: Best WM for slow machine?
> >
> >
> > > On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 07:45:31PM -0400, Daniel Hoffman wrote:
> > > > I've got an older Pentium 166 with 16 megs of RAM that I want
to put
> > Debian
> > > > on. I already tried once, and put KDE on it, but that was very
sloooow
> > and
> > > > unresponsive. What's your favorite lightweight (but still
fully
> > functional!)
> > > > window manager? FVWM? Enlightenment? Windowmaker?
> > >
> > > I would recommend PWM -
> > > http://www.students.tut.fi/~tuomov/pwm/
> > > kent
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> +----------------+
> http://www.burningclown.com
> "Everyone's Portal to Nothing At All"
> +----------------+
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
