CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 12:25:01AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: >> sawfish is more or less waiting on two things: gnome-libs, and > >Erm. Why does it need to? gnome-libs is an option and not a need for it. I've >gotten it working fine without it and I'd really rather not need gnome >to run sawfish. > >Will there be a gnome-free sawfish?
There is: the sawfish package itself doesn't need gnome-libs. However, the source package that generates sawfish also generates sawfish-gnome (see 'apt-cache showsrc sawfish'), and so both of them have to go in together. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
