-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> is that a serious question??? > the pentium has nothing to say against the G4. period. moreover, CISC > is just pittyful compared to RISC. Irrelevant with today's modern CPUs like the PIII. The G3, G4, PII, PIII CPUs all take the best properties of RISC & CISC. > then again, unless you are talking absolutely high volume, there is > nothing of big computational cost that your server will do, so i'd > assume a pentium would work just as fine. however, if you have the > means, go for the G4! No, go for the PIII, especially if you're going to run Linux - ix86 systems are simply better supported than powermacs. That can be a big deal if you're going to run software available only as a binary. - -- - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Phil Brutsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG fingerprint: 9BF9 D84C 37D0 4FA7 1F2D 7E5E FD94 D264 50DE 1CFC GPG key id: 50DE1CFC GPG public key: http://tux.creighton.edu/~pbrutsch/gpg-public-key.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7Dcy7/ZTSZFDeHPwRAgauAKChfZAYTND16YC+nZE9VHwv/g3pvACgwR1b qO9NLRrC3VOQy8eWjpSTo0w= =yS8m -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
