-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> Hi all.. > > Unstable has Samba 2.2.0 but it requires a newer version of libc than is > supplied with 2.2r3. I'm a bit anxious about upgrading lib6 so I got the > sources and compiled Samba under 2.2r3. It compiled fine. Anyone know of any > issues to be aware of? Yes: It's almost too damn new. Unless you need the capabilities Samba 2.2.x has over Samba 2.0.9, you should be running Samba 2.0.9 until the 2.2.x tree has seen more testing (unless, of course, you've been testing it yourself for a while). Beyond that... it works great on the systems I have at home. The ability to change file permissions from the Windows GUI rocks :) > I really need the new Samba in an attempt at ditching a few NT > Servers! You'll thank yourself. One of the most problematic boxes at work is the WinNT file server... - -- - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Phil Brutsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG fingerprint: 9BF9 D84C 37D0 4FA7 1F2D 7E5E FD94 D264 50DE 1CFC GPG key id: 50DE1CFC GPG public key: http://tux.creighton.edu/~pbrutsch/gpg-public-key.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6/GcO/ZTSZFDeHPwRAjJsAKCUcfRpmAsjcY/uMdAF616Opiub9gCfRw8r Urf0yh1uhogS549JmAE2MpI= =qcnm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
