* On 07-05-01 at 02:07 Florian Petri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: +----Here quoted text begins----+ [...] > > I?m currently thinking about compiling samba on my own, throwing out > everything which doesn?t work like this PAM authentification and hopefully > this will solve my problems. But I would prefer to use the binary > distribution ... Did you by any chance had any better success with hand built samba 2.2.0? > > > cu Floh > +----and here the quote ends----+ Actually I am having the same problem: May 8 21:50:56 ursa smbd[32522]: Matchname failed on neonatus-nt 192.168.1.4 May 8 21:50:56 ursa smbd[32522]: PAM: Account Validation Failed - Rejecting +User! May 8 21:50:56 ursa smbd[32522]: PAM: UNKNOWN ERROR for User: Administrator May 8 21:50:56 ursa smbd[32522]: host name/name mismatch: neonatus-nt != +neonatus-nt.local.net May 8 21:50:56 ursa smbd[32522]: [2001/05/08 21:50:56, 0] +lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_name(1060) May 8 21:50:56 ursa smbd[32522]: [2001/05/08 21:50:56, 0] +lib/util_sock.c:matchname(1008) May 8 21:50:56 ursa smbd[32522]: [2001/05/08 21:50:56, 0] +passdb/pampass.c:pam_account(268) May 8 21:50:56 ursa smbd[32522]: [2001/05/08 21:50:56, 0] +passdb/pampass.c:pam_accountcheck(381)
Win9x machines login great.. everything works great, but when I try to log in from the NT 4.0 wks I get an error saying the ser was disabled... I have read the samba docs from the source package, searched over the samba site, nowhere is anything mentioned on the topic... I have added the user Administrator, the machine account also... but still that error. With the same config and samba 2.0.7 it worked perfectly! B. -- Boštjan Müller [NEONATUS], [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://neonatus.net/~neonatus For my PGP key finger: [EMAIL PROTECTED], RSA id: 0x90178DBD, ICQ #:7506644 Celular: +386(0)41243189, Powered by Debian GNU/LiNUX , Student of VFUL The three Rs of Microsoft support: Retry, Reboot, Reinstall.
