On Sun Feb 25 14:33:51 2001 brian moore wrote...
>
>On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 02:08:38PM -0500, Stan Brown wrote:
>> Let;s just cut to the chase on this.
>>
>> I need to be able to create, and work with larg files (> 2G) under
>> Debian Linux. Secondly I need the moststable system for doing this,
>> as it will be a production machine.
>
>You need many things from 'unstable' (though perhaps most of them are
>now in 'testing', I haven't looked).
>
>The biggies:
> a 2.4.x kernel
> glibc2.1
> lots of little things like the current fileutils, etc
Thanks for the quick reply.
So, it looks like I have 2 choices here (remeber I have already
upgraded to
testing).
1. Cahnge ap-get sources to unstable, Take a deep breath, and do apt-get
opgrade.
2. Figure out how to get a 2.4 kerne built on "tetsting"
2b. Find someone who has /debs for 2.4 for "testing"
If I do 1. will I get the 2.4 kernel?
2 Will require me to figure out how to build the Debian way, a kernel
for
which I do not hvae .debs, since the 2.4 kerenel is not offered as a
choice by
dselect.
>
>Remember 'unstable' doesn't mean "it crashes like Windows" -- it means
>that it is constantly changing. It's probably fine for a production
>machine though you'll have to keep up on security updates yourself.
>(And be careful of 'apt-get upgrade' since some days things may be
>broken. :))
>
>> I have no particular bias as to what filesystem type I use for this.
>
>It doesn't matter..... the limit isn't related to the filesystem
>(despite what some people keep saying), but to the kernel API and glibc.
>ext2 has supported huge files on Alpha forever... because the length of
>an 'int' is 64 bits on Alpha.... so glibc and the kernel handle it
>without any special API's.
So are you saying I could stay with ex2fs? Are you certain of this?
>
>> How do I go about seting up a machine to do this?
>
>See above. It works fine on 'unstable', and probably works on 'testing'
>if you upgrade the kernel to 2.4.
Got a pointer to how to compile a 2.4 kernel, the Debian wya, on
"testing"?
--
Stan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] 843-745-3154
Charleston SC.
--
Windows 98: n.
useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and
a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system
originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit
company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition.
-
(c) 2000 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited.
