On 15/02/03 Paul Johnson did speaketh: > Why does everybody keep saying this when it's false? Aptitude and > apt-get are getting thier information from the same place and making > the same decisions. Both tell you quite specifically what is going on > before it asks you to commit to it. Nobody has yet demonstrated on > the list anything that you can do in aptitude easier or faster than > you can with some combination of apt-file, apt-cache and apt-get. > > "But aptitude's a front end to apt!" No, apt is a front end to dpkg, > and aptitude is a replacement to dselect when using apt as a source.
I couldn't agree more. I am not impressed by the interactive tools at all.
apt-get, apt-cache are why I use Debian. If they're deprecated then we have a
problem. Both dselect and aptitude make me suffer from information overload.
apt-get gives me what I need, when I need it.
One of the best things about apt-get is that removals trace dependencies,
so if I want to remove all X packages, all I have to do is apt-get remove on a
base X library, and _everything_ that depends on X transitively will be
removed. There isn't a distribution around that has that functionality.
I implore the developers to focus on apt.
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuPG pub key: 5BC8BE08
"...the word HACK is used as a verb to indicate a massive amount
of nerd-like effort." -Harley Hahn, A Student's Guide to Unix
HTML Email Considered Harmful: http://expita.com/nomime.html
msg31096/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
