Hello! > I just did an incremental 'apt-get dist-upgrade' to my > woody/testing box and got moved to gcc 2.95.3 (along with associated > libraries) as part of that process. Once it was done, I found that > the symlinks corresponding to libstdc++.so and libstdc++.a had been > deleted without replacement.
I didn't realise that till now, but the same must have happend to my system, too, when I did the upgrade some days ago. > (More precisely, did it happen because of a peculiarity of my system, > or is it an installation bug to be brought to the attention of the gcc > package maintainers.) Well, it seems to be a bug in the libstdc++ package. Let's hope there are no other bugs in the package. Just another question: Why do we need gcc-2.95.3 while this version still is in development? Bye, Martin -- Ernst Martin Witte email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~witte (g4 c g f g8 as) g2. '(g4 es c)(d c8 h)c2(b4 as8 g)as2(g4 f8 e)f1. (Anton Bruckner)
