On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 20:24, Rob Weir wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:03:46AM -0600, Craig Jackson wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 02:11, Angel L. Mateo wrote: > > > El Jueves, 13 de Febrero de 2003 15:32, Rob Weir escribió: > > > > > > > > > > You don't need unstable to use TLS with evolution or Kmail. I used > > > > > evolution and now I use Kmail (kde 3.1), both with stable. > > > > > > > > I dunno about evolution with TLS support, but kmail 3.1 certainly isn't > > > > in stable. > > > > > > Yes, you are right. I meant that I have woody (stable) with kde 3.1, > > > installed (.deb) from kde. And the evolution I tried I think it was the > > > evolution from woody. > > > > > > > The Evolution/stable that installs from Woody does not suppot TLS. I > > worked through all of those dependency issues last night and was able to > > install Evolution/unstable which does support TLS. All I can say is > > "Praise Debian" because it would have been a nightmare trying to juggle > > all of those RPMs under Redhat. Problem solved. > > Two other possible solutions: > * is there a evolution-(tls|ssl) package in non-US/main? > * go read up on 'apt-get source'; it makes it fairly simple to rebuild > packages from sid on woody and sarge systems, which save you having to > update your libraries and such (you're effectively running sid at the > moment).
Thanks, but I took care the dependencies one by one. It was not hard and took about 20 minutes, but I would not have wanted to do that on a number of work stations, as easy as apt-get made it. RPM would have been impossible. -- Craig Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
