Are you using the xfs-xtt font server or the xfs font server? You refer to both. AFAIK only the xfs font server works with version 4 and to use it you do need unix/:7100 in the front of the font paths. X starts with the first line and if it doesn't work, it tries the next line, etc.
--- Daishi Harada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >Hello, > >I recently moved from stable to testing, and in the process to XF86 >(4.0.2-1). The problem that I am having is that fonts/text seem to get >corrupted/not properly refreshed; i.e., when I originally type text >everything is fine, but if I occlude the text (e.g. with another >window) and then bring the text window to the foreground the fonts >become corrupted (the fonts looks like they're missing some >scanlines). Has anyone encountered with problem/know a solution? > >I'm using the neomagic driver (for a Thinkpad 560x). I'm using xfs-xtt >for my font server, and played with the config there a bit, and am >pretty sure that's not the issue. Speaking of which, however, does >anyone know why fonts look worse through xfs? I put the same paths in >/etc/X11/xfs/config's "catalogue" field as I have in XF86Config's >FontPath fields, but if I go through xfs (i.e., if I have "unix/:7100" >listed as the first FontPath) the same fonts look different than when >I put the "unix/:7100" last. > >Please cc me with any replies, >Thanks, Daishi > > >-- >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] _____________________________________________________________ Want a new web-based email account ? ---> http://www.firstlinux.net
