On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 10:09:39PM -0500, Chris Mitchell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 10:43:25AM -0600, Larry Holish wrote:
> > I think you should be using 'snd-emu10k1', rather than
> > 'snd-card-emu10k1' here. See the note at the top of
> > /usr/share/doc/alsa-base/README.Debian.
>
> Hmm... My version of that document doesn't mention that, but it does
> sound familiar. Anyway, I tried it. Stopped alsa, edited
> /etc/alsa/modutils/0.9, replaced both occurrences (one alias and one in
> options), ran update-modules, checked the change had in fact taken effect
> in modules.conf, started alsa... no change. I wouldn't need to run that
> snddevices script again or anything before it'll take effect, would I?
Okay, now this is odd. After your changes, lsmod showed that all of the
alsa sound-related modules were *gone*. So I changed it back, updated
everything, and got a "no alsa driver installed" error. So I ran
alsaconf *again*. And got a new error from it:
miguel# /etc/init.d/alsa start
Starting ALSA sound driver (version 0.9.0beta10):modprobe: Invalid line
90 in /etc/modules.conf
snd_adc_frame_size
failed.
modprobe: Invalid line 90 in /etc/modules.conf
snd_adc_frame_size
miguel#
Anybody know what an adc frame size is and where I can find out what
value goes there for my card? (I googled creativelabs for it and got
nothing)...
Thanks
-Chris
msg30853/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
