ยป Joris Lambrecht said this and I say that:
> This guy is in deep trouble guys, try helping him out ...
>
> Apperently i couldn't help him
Count me in this trouble too. My guess is that it's something
about modules - I compiled two 2.4 test12 kernels - one of them had
_almost_ everything as modules (except for ext2 support and other
fundamental things), the other one had everything built-in. The first
had the same problem - with an IDE device - and the other one worked fine.
Should it be a kernel bug?
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 04:42:02PM -0500, David B. Harris wrote:
> > To quote Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > # I wonder why this is even an option; is there a reason anyone would
> > # install Linux without ext2 support?
> > # I have always wondered why the option was given.
> >
> > ReiserFS/ext3: Some people run ReiserFS or ext3, so they don't need ext2
> > support built into the kernel.
>
> I am one of those persons....I am running a HP SCSI-based machine in a
> production environment
> for web- and e-mail-hosting purposes and I have compiled (2.2.17) with
> reiserfs builtin and ext2 as a module...just in case.....
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Abracos e briagdeiros,
francisco m. neto
(a.k.a ikari himura keiichi)
Linux User #192809
ICQ #78493934
http://socrates.if.usp.br/~einstein
"Toke au kokoro ga, watashi o kowasu"
-- Ayanami Rei
